ETFs with the most different mix from MQXS (MACQUARIE GLOBAL SMALL COMPANIES ACTIVE ETF)
The ASX ETFs whose mix differs most from MQXS: by country mix, CETF (100% of the portfolio would have to move to match MQXS). Figures as shown on 2026-10-16, from each fund's latest published holdings, rebuilt daily.
By sector
Not enough of this fund's holdings are classified to rank it on this axis.
By country
| Fund | Mix gap | Holdings classified | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CETFVanEck FTSE China A50 ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| CNEWVanEck China New Economy ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| GRINVanEck India Growth Leaders ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| IINDBetaShares India Quality ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| IKOiShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| IZZiShares China Large-Cap ETF | 100% | 98% | Compare |
| NDIAGlobal X India Nifty 50 ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| IAAiShares Asia 50 ETF | 98% | 99% | Compare |
| EMXCiShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 98% | 99% | Compare |
| EMKTVanEck MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 98% | 100% | Compare |
How to read this
Mix gap is the share of a portfolio that would have to move between sectors or countries for the fund to match MQXS's mix: 0% is the same mix, 100% is nothing in common. It compares only the holdings that could be classified (75% of MQXS by sector, 92% by country; every fund listed has at least 80%), and only funds in the same asset class (equity-intl). Geared, inverse and long-short funds are left out. A different mix is not a lower-risk or lower-correlation fund: it only means the money sits in other sectors or countries, and it often surfaces narrow funds.
See also funds with a similar mix, or everything about MQXS.
General information only, not financial product advice. It does not consider your objectives, finances or needs. Read the fund's product disclosure statement before making any decision. See About for where the data comes from.