Compare MTUM · AQLT
MTUM and AQLT hold at least 117 companies between them. 14 are in both, and 30.5% of each fund is the same companies.
We can see through 99.4% of these funds to individual companies. The rest is cash, bonds, or a fund whose holdings we cannot see, so every figure here is a floor.
Return, last year
Price only, last year, each fund starting at 100. Switch to total return to add distributions.
Side by side
Holdings, fund by fund
- Materials
- Financials
- Health Care
- Consumer Discretionary
- Communication Services
- Everything else
- RIORIO TINTO LIMITEDIn 1 of 2MTUM9.8%AQLTnot held
- CSLCSL LIMITEDIn 1 of 2MTUMnot heldAQLT9.6%
- BHPBHP GROUP LIMITEDIn all 2MTUM7.7%AQLT4.6%
- WESWESFARMERS LIMITEDIn all 2MTUM1.9%AQLT5.7%
- TLSTELSTRA GROUP LIMITEDIn all 2MTUM5.0%AQLT5.3%
- ANZANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn all 2MTUM5.3%AQLT4.1%
- CBACOMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 1 of 2MTUMnot heldAQLT4.9%
- EVNEVOLUTION MINING LIMITEDIn 1 of 2MTUM4.9%AQLTnot held
- NABNATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn all 2MTUM2.4%AQLT4.6%
- MQGMACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn all 2MTUM4.4%AQLT3.5%
What each fund is in
Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself. Cash, bonds and funds we cannot open that come to under 1% of a bar are in Everything else.
What MTUM already gives you
- MTUM and AQLT share 14 companies30.5%A floor, not a measurement: one of these funds is not fully resolved to individual companies.
Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.
What each fund changed
Reading the holdings history…
Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.