Compare MTUM · GMVW
MTUM and GMVW hold 128 companies between them. 38 are in both, and 38.8% of each fund is the same companies.
Return, last year
Price only, last year, each fund starting at 100. Switch to total return to add distributions.
Side by side
Holdings, fund by fund
- Materials
- Financials
- Industrials
- Real Estate
- Energy
- Everything else
- RIORIO TINTO LIMITEDIn all 2MTUM9.8%GMVW1.2%
- BHPBHP GROUP LIMITEDIn all 2MTUM7.7%GMVW1.3%
- ANZANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn all 2MTUM5.3%GMVW1.4%
- TLSTELSTRA GROUP LIMITEDIn all 2MTUM5.0%GMVW1.4%
- EVNEVOLUTION MINING LIMITEDIn all 2MTUM4.9%GMVW1.2%
- MQGMACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn all 2MTUM4.4%GMVW1.3%
- WDSWOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTDIn all 2MTUM3.8%GMVW1.3%
- NSTNORTHERN STAR RESOURCES LTDIn all 2MTUM3.4%GMVW1.4%
- WOWWOOLWORTHS GROUP LIMITEDIn all 2MTUM2.8%GMVW1.4%
- PLSPLS GROUP LIMITEDIn all 2MTUM2.7%GMVW1.0%
What each fund is in
Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself. Cash, bonds and funds we cannot open that come to under 1% of a bar are in Everything else.
What MTUM already gives you
- MTUM and GMVW share 38 companies38.8%A floor, not a measurement: one of these funds is not fully resolved to individual companies.
Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.
What each fund changed
Reading the holdings history…
Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.