Compare MVB · BUGG · HACK
MVB, BUGG and HACK hold 62 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and BUGG and HACK are the most alike: 46.0% of each is the same companies.
Return, last year
Price only, last year, each fund starting at 100. Switch to total return to add distributions.
Side by side
Holdings, fund by fund
- Information Technology
- Financials
- Industrials
- Communication Services
- ANZANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 1 of 3MVB20.7%BUGGnot heldHACKnot held
- NABNATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 1 of 3MVB20.2%BUGGnot heldHACKnot held
- WBCWESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 1 of 3MVB20.2%BUGGnot heldHACKnot held
- CBACOMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 1 of 3MVB19.2%BUGGnot heldHACKnot held
- MQGMACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 1 of 3MVB17.5%BUGGnot heldHACKnot held
- OKTAOKTA INCIn 2 of 3MVBnot heldBUGG9.8%HACK4.4%
- CRWDCROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INCIn 2 of 3MVBnot heldBUGG8.3%HACK8.9%
- FTNTFORTINET INCIn 2 of 3MVBnot heldBUGG7.5%HACK8.1%
- PANWPALO ALTO NETWORKS INCIn 2 of 3MVBnot heldBUGG7.8%HACK8.0%
- CSCOCISCO SYSTEMS INCIn 1 of 3MVBnot heldBUGGnot heldHACK7.6%
What each fund is in
Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself.
What MVB already gives you
- MVB and BUGG share 0 companies0.0%
- MVB and HACK share 0 companies0.0%
- BUGG and HACK share 20 companies46.0%
Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.
What each fund changed
Reading the holdings history…
Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.