MVB vs GAME vs HACK vs CLDD vs QFN
MVB, GAME, HACK, CLDD and QFN hold at least 137 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and MVB and QFN are the most alike: 71% of each is the same companies.
Side by side
FundVanEckBetaSharesBetaSharesBetaSharesBetaShares
Asset classSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematic
Fee a year0.28%0.57%0.67%0.67%0.34%
Fund size$279.0m$36.0m$1.2b$33.0m$80.0m
Holdings844514329
1Y price return−4.6%+0.5%only priced since 2026-09-24+24.5%+15.8%−4.8%
Distribution yield4.53%2.33%3.16%0.00%2.21%
Look-through coverage100.0%98.8%100.0%99.9%98.5%
Return, last year
change since the start
share of each fund
- MVB
- GAME
- HACK
- CLDD
- QFN
- CBA COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 2 of 5MVB19.2%GAMEnot heldHACKnot heldCLDDnot heldQFN28.7%
- ANZ ANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 2 of 5MVB20.7%GAMEnot heldHACKnot heldCLDDnot heldQFN13.3%
- NAB NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 2 of 5MVB20.2%GAMEnot heldHACKnot heldCLDDnot heldQFN14.0%
- WBC WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 2 of 5MVB20.2%GAMEnot heldHACKnot heldCLDDnot heldQFN13.7%
- MQG MACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 2 of 5MVB17.5%GAMEnot heldHACKnot heldCLDDnot heldQFN10.2%
and 127 more companies the funds hold