MVB

Compare MVB · HACK · BNKS · CLDD · ATEC

  • MVBbase
  • HACK
  • BNKS
  • CLDD
  • ATEC

MVB, HACK, BNKS, CLDD and ATEC hold 183 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and HACK and CLDD are the most alike: 17.1% of each is the same companies.

Return, last year

each fund starting at 100

Price only, last year, each fund starting at 100. No fund here paid a distribution in this window.

Side by side

 MVBHACKBNKSCLDDATEC
FundVanEckBetaSharesBetaSharesBetaSharesBetaShares
Asset classSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematic
Fee a year0.28%0.67%0.57%0.67%0.48%
Fund size$279.0m$1.2b$180.0m$33.0m$613.6m
Holdings851784344
1Y price return−4.7%+24.6%+24.1%+15.1%−0.0%only priced since 2026-09-24
Distribution yield4.53%3.16%5.62%0.00%1.97%
Look-through coverage100.0%100.0%99.0%99.9%99.7%

Holdings, fund by fund

share of each fund
Show
Colour by
  • Information Technology
  • Financials
  • Communication Services
  • Industrials
  • Health Care
  • Everything else
  • ANZANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 1 of 5MVB20.7%HACKnot heldBNKSnot heldCLDDnot heldATECnot held
  • NABNATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 1 of 5MVB20.2%HACKnot heldBNKSnot heldCLDDnot heldATECnot held
  • WBCWESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 1 of 5MVB20.2%HACKnot heldBNKSnot heldCLDDnot heldATECnot held
  • CBACOMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 1 of 5MVB19.2%HACKnot heldBNKSnot heldCLDDnot heldATECnot held
  • MQGMACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 1 of 5MVB17.5%HACKnot heldBNKSnot heldCLDDnot heldATECnot held
  • CPUCOMPUTERSHARE LIMITED.In 1 of 5MVBnot heldHACKnot heldBNKSnot heldCLDDnot heldATEC10.5%
  • CRWDCROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INCIn 1 of 5MVBnot heldHACK8.9%BNKSnot heldCLDDnot heldATECnot held
  • XROXERO LIMITEDIn 1 of 5MVBnot heldHACKnot heldBNKSnot heldCLDDnot heldATEC8.2%
  • FTNTFORTINET INCIn 1 of 5MVBnot heldHACK8.1%BNKSnot heldCLDDnot heldATECnot held
  • PMEPRO MEDICUS LIMITEDIn 1 of 5MVBnot heldHACKnot heldBNKSnot heldCLDDnot heldATEC8.0%

What each fund is in

MVB
HACK
BNKS
CLDD
ATEC

Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself. Cash, bonds and funds we cannot open that come to under 1% of a bar are in Everything else.

What MVB already gives you

overlap
  • MVB and ATEC share 0 companies0.0%
  • MVB and BNKS share 0 companies0.0%
    A floor, not a measurement: one of these funds is not fully resolved to individual companies.
  • MVB and CLDD share 0 companies0.0%
  • MVB and HACK share 0 companies0.0%
  • HACK and CLDD share 9 companies17.1%
  • BNKS and ATEC share 0 companies0.0%
    A floor, not a measurement: one of these funds is not fully resolved to individual companies.
Show the other 4
  • BNKS and CLDD share 0 companies0.0%
    A floor, not a measurement: one of these funds is not fully resolved to individual companies.
  • CLDD and ATEC share 0 companies0.0%
  • HACK and ATEC share 0 companies0.0%
  • HACK and BNKS share 0 companies0.0%
    A floor, not a measurement: one of these funds is not fully resolved to individual companies.

Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.

What each fund changed

most recent holdings update

Reading the holdings history…

Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.