MVB vs QFN vs CLDD vs CURE vs HACK
MVB, QFN, CLDD, CURE and HACK hold 259 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and MVB and QFN are the most alike: 71% of each is the same companies.
Side by side
FundVanEckBetaSharesBetaSharesGlobal XBetaShares
Asset classSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematic
Fee a year0.28%0.34%0.67%0.45%0.67%
Fund size$279.0m$80.0m$33.0m$39.6m$1.2b
Holdings8294315751
1Y price return−4.6%−4.8%+15.8%+33.9%+24.5%
Distribution yield4.53%2.21%0.00%0.00%3.16%
Look-through coverage100.0%98.5%99.9%100.0%100.0%
Return, last year
change since the start
share of each fund
- MVB
- QFN
- CLDD
- CURE
- HACK
- CBA COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 2 of 5MVB19.2%QFN28.7%CLDDnot heldCUREnot heldHACKnot held
- ANZ ANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 2 of 5MVB20.7%QFN13.3%CLDDnot heldCUREnot heldHACKnot held
- NAB NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 2 of 5MVB20.2%QFN14.0%CLDDnot heldCUREnot heldHACKnot held
- WBC WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 2 of 5MVB20.2%QFN13.7%CLDDnot heldCUREnot heldHACKnot held
- MQG MACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 2 of 5MVB17.5%QFN10.2%CLDDnot heldCUREnot heldHACKnot held
and 249 more companies the funds hold