ETFs with the most different mix from MVE (VanEck S&P/ASX MidCap ETF)

The ASX ETFs whose mix differs most from MVE: by industry mix, OZXX (53% of the portfolio would have to move to match MVE). Figures as shown on 2026-10-11, from each fund's latest published holdings, rebuilt daily.

By industry

FundMix gapHoldings classified 
OZXXGlobal X Australia ex Financials & Resources ETF53%99%Compare
ZYAUGlobal X S&P/ASX 200 High Dividend ETF50%100%Compare
RDVRUSSELL INVESTMENTS HIGH DIVIDEND AUSTRALIAN SHARES ETF45%98%Compare
HYLDBETASHARES S&P AUSTRALIAN SHARES HIGH YIELD ETF43%99%Compare
SYISTATE STREET SPDR MSCI AUS SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND YIELD ETF42%99%Compare
AQLTBetaShares Australian Quality ETF41%99%Compare
IHDiShares S&P/ASX Dividend Opportunities ESG Screened ETF41%99%Compare
VLCVanguard MSCI Australian Large Companies Index ETF38%100%Compare
YMAXBetaShares Australian Top 20 Equities Yield Maximiser Complex ETF36%99%Compare
ILCiShares S&P/ASX 20 ETF36%99%Compare

By country

Not ranked: MVE's holdings are almost all in one country, so every fund in its class looks the same by country.

How to read this

Mix gap is the share of a portfolio that would have to move between industries or countries for the fund to match MVE's mix: 0% is the same mix, 100% is nothing in common. It compares only the holdings that could be classified (100% of MVE by industry, 100% by country; every fund listed has at least 80%), and only funds in the same asset class (equity-au). Geared, inverse and long-short funds are left out. A different mix is not a lower-risk or lower-correlation fund: it only means the money sits in other industries or countries, and it often surfaces narrow funds.

See also funds with a similar mix, or everything about MVE.

General information only, not financial product advice. It does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Consider whether it is right for you and read the fund's product disclosure statement before deciding. See About for where the data comes from.