ETFs with the most different mix from MVS (VanEck Small Companies Masters ETF)

The ASX ETFs whose mix differs most from MVS: by industry mix, SYI (51% of the portfolio would have to move to match MVS). Figures as shown on 2026-10-11, from each fund's latest published holdings, rebuilt daily.

By industry

FundMix gapHoldings classified 
SYISTATE STREET SPDR MSCI AUS SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND YIELD ETF51%99%Compare
FAIRBetaShares Australian Sustainability Leaders ETF47%99%Compare
ZYAUGlobal X S&P/ASX 200 High Dividend ETF45%100%Compare
AQLTBetaShares Australian Quality ETF43%99%Compare
OZXXGlobal X Australia ex Financials & Resources ETF42%99%Compare
RDVRUSSELL INVESTMENTS HIGH DIVIDEND AUSTRALIAN SHARES ETF41%98%Compare
HYLDBETASHARES S&P AUSTRALIAN SHARES HIGH YIELD ETF39%99%Compare
VLCVanguard MSCI Australian Large Companies Index ETF38%100%Compare
GRNVVanEck MSCI Australian Sustainable Equity ETF37%100%Compare
AQTYVANECK MSCI AUSTRALIAN QUALITY PLUS ETF37%100%Compare

By country

Not ranked: MVS's holdings are almost all in one country, so every fund in its class looks the same by country.

How to read this

Mix gap is the share of a portfolio that would have to move between industries or countries for the fund to match MVS's mix: 0% is the same mix, 100% is nothing in common. It compares only the holdings that could be classified (98% of MVS by industry, 98% by country; every fund listed has at least 80%), and only funds in the same asset class (equity-au). Geared, inverse and long-short funds are left out. A different mix is not a lower-risk or lower-correlation fund: it only means the money sits in other industries or countries, and it often surfaces narrow funds.

See also funds with a similar mix, or everything about MVS.

General information only, not financial product advice. It does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Consider whether it is right for you and read the fund's product disclosure statement before deciding. See About for where the data comes from.