Compare PAVE · FANG · MVB
PAVE, FANG and MVB hold 117 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and PAVE and FANG are the most alike: 0.0% of each is the same companies.
Return, last year
Price only, last year, each fund starting at 100. Switch to total return to add distributions.
Side by side
Holdings, fund by fund
- Financials
- Industrials
- Information Technology
- Communication Services
- Materials
- Everything else
- ANZANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 1 of 3PAVEnot heldFANGnot heldMVB20.7%
- NABNATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 1 of 3PAVEnot heldFANGnot heldMVB20.2%
- WBCWESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 1 of 3PAVEnot heldFANGnot heldMVB20.2%
- CBACOMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 1 of 3PAVEnot heldFANGnot heldMVB19.2%
- MQGMACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 1 of 3PAVEnot heldFANGnot heldMVB17.5%
- MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY INCIn 1 of 3PAVEnot heldFANG11.0%MVBnot held
- PLTRPALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INCIn 1 of 3PAVEnot heldFANG10.4%MVBnot held
- NVDANVIDIA CORPIn 1 of 3PAVEnot heldFANG10.3%MVBnot held
- METAMETA PLATFORMS INCIn 1 of 3PAVEnot heldFANG10.3%MVBnot held
- MSFTMICROSOFT CORPIn 1 of 3PAVEnot heldFANG10.0%MVBnot held
What each fund is in
Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself.
What PAVE already gives you
- PAVE and FANG share 0 companies0.0%
- PAVE and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
- FANG and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.
What each fund changed
Reading the holdings history…
Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.