Compare PAVE · MVB · HACK
PAVE, MVB and HACK hold 152 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and PAVE and HACK are the most alike: 0.0% of each is the same companies.
Return, last year
Price only, last year, each fund starting at 100. Switch to total return to add distributions.
Side by side
Holdings, fund by fund
- Financials
- Information Technology
- Industrials
- Materials
- Utilities
- Everything else
- ANZANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 1 of 3PAVEnot heldMVB20.7%HACKnot held
- NABNATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 1 of 3PAVEnot heldMVB20.2%HACKnot held
- WBCWESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 1 of 3PAVEnot heldMVB20.2%HACKnot held
- CBACOMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 1 of 3PAVEnot heldMVB19.2%HACKnot held
- MQGMACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 1 of 3PAVEnot heldMVB17.5%HACKnot held
- CRWDCROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INCIn 1 of 3PAVEnot heldMVBnot heldHACK8.9%
- FTNTFORTINET INCIn 1 of 3PAVEnot heldMVBnot heldHACK8.1%
- PANWPALO ALTO NETWORKS INCIn 1 of 3PAVEnot heldMVBnot heldHACK8.0%
- CSCOCISCO SYSTEMS INCIn 1 of 3PAVEnot heldMVBnot heldHACK7.6%
- AVGOBROADCOM INCIn 1 of 3PAVEnot heldMVBnot heldHACK7.5%
What each fund is in
Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself.
What PAVE already gives you
- PAVE and HACK share 0 companies0.0%
- PAVE and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
- MVB and HACK share 0 companies0.0%
Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.
What each fund changed
Reading the holdings history…
Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.