QFN vs MVB vs WIRE vs CLDD vs HACK
QFN, MVB, WIRE, CLDD and HACK hold 141 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and QFN and MVB are the most alike: 71% of each is the same companies.
Side by side
FundBetaSharesVanEckGlobal XBetaSharesBetaShares
Asset classSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematic
Fee a year0.34%0.28%0.65%0.67%0.67%
Fund size$80.0m$279.0m$746.6m$33.0m$1.2b
Holdings298404351
1Y price return−4.8%−4.6%+20.3%+15.8%+24.5%
Distribution yield2.21%4.53%3.04%0.00%3.16%
Look-through coverage98.5%100.0%99.5%99.9%100.0%
Return, last year
change since the start
share of each fund
- QFN
- MVB
- WIRE
- CLDD
- HACK
- CBA COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 2 of 5QFN28.7%MVB19.2%WIREnot heldCLDDnot heldHACKnot held
- ANZ ANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 2 of 5QFN13.3%MVB20.7%WIREnot heldCLDDnot heldHACKnot held
- NAB NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 2 of 5QFN14.0%MVB20.2%WIREnot heldCLDDnot heldHACKnot held
- WBC WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 2 of 5QFN13.7%MVB20.2%WIREnot heldCLDDnot heldHACKnot held
- MQG MACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 2 of 5QFN10.2%MVB17.5%WIREnot heldCLDDnot heldHACKnot held
and 131 more companies the funds hold