ETFs with the most different mix from QNDQ (BETASHARES NASDAQ 100 EQUAL WEIGHT ETF)
The ASX ETFs whose mix differs most from QNDQ: by industry mix, LEND (99% of the portfolio would have to move to match QNDQ); by country mix, EMKT (100% of the portfolio would have to move to match QNDQ). Figures as shown on 2026-10-11, from each fund's latest published holdings, rebuilt daily.
By industry
| Fund | Mix gap | Holdings classified | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LENDVANECK GLBL LISTED PRIVATE CREDIT (AUD HEDGED) ETF | 99% | 100% | Compare |
| GPEQVANECK GLOBAL LISTED PRIVATE EQUITY ETF | 98% | 91% | Compare |
| IFRAVanEck FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF | 80% | 100% | Compare |
| GLINiShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF | 80% | 99% | Compare |
| ZYUSGlobal X S&P 500 High Yield Low Volatility ETF | 63% | 98% | Compare |
| IZZiShares China Large-Cap ETF | 59% | 98% | Compare |
| F100BetaShares FTSE 100 ETF | 57% | 98% | Compare |
| H100BetaShares FTSE 100 Currency Hedged ETF | 57% | 98% | Compare |
| QSMLVanEck MSCI International Small Companies Quality ETF | 52% | 100% | Compare |
| QHSMVanEck MSCI International Small Companies Quality (AUD Hedged) ETF | 52% | 100% | Compare |
By country
| Fund | Mix gap | Holdings classified | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EMKTVanEck MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| CETFVanEck FTSE China A50 ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| CNEWVanEck China New Economy ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| EMXCiShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| GRINVanEck India Growth Leaders ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| HJPNBetaShares Japan Currency Hedged ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| IAAiShares Asia 50 ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| IINDBetaShares India Quality ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| IJPiShares MSCI Japan ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| IKOiShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
How to read this
Mix gap is the share of a portfolio that would have to move between industries or countries for the fund to match QNDQ's mix: 0% is the same mix, 100% is nothing in common. It compares only the holdings that could be classified (100% of QNDQ by industry, 100% by country; every fund listed has at least 80%), and only funds in the same asset class (equity-intl). Geared, inverse and long-short funds are left out. A different mix is not a lower-risk or lower-correlation fund: it only means the money sits in other industries or countries, and it often surfaces narrow funds.
See also funds with a similar mix, or everything about QNDQ.
General information only, not financial product advice. It does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Consider whether it is right for you and read the fund's product disclosure statement before deciding. See About for where the data comes from.