Compare QNTM · MVB · TECH
QNTM, MVB and TECH hold 109 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and QNTM and TECH are the most alike: 7.4% of each is the same companies.
Return, last year
Price only, last year, each fund starting at 100. No fund here paid a distribution in this window.
Side by side
Holdings, fund by fund
- Information Technology
- Financials
- Industrials
- Consumer Discretionary
- Communication Services
- Everything else
- ANZANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 1 of 3QNTMnot heldMVB20.7%TECHnot held
- NABNATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 1 of 3QNTMnot heldMVB20.2%TECHnot held
- WBCWESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 1 of 3QNTMnot heldMVB20.2%TECHnot held
- CBACOMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 1 of 3QNTMnot heldMVB19.2%TECHnot held
- MQGMACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 1 of 3QNTMnot heldMVB17.5%TECHnot held
- ANETARISTA NETWORKS INCIn 1 of 3QNTMnot heldMVBnot heldTECH4.5%
- MSFTMICROSOFT CORPIn 2 of 3QNTM1.9%MVBnot heldTECH4.3%
- APHAMPHENOL CORP CLASS AIn 1 of 3QNTMnot heldMVBnot heldTECH4.2%
- NVDANVIDIA CORPIn 2 of 3QNTM1.9%MVBnot heldTECH4.0%
- 6758SONY GROUP CORPIn 1 of 3QNTMnot heldMVBnot heldTECH3.9%
What each fund is in
Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself. Cash, bonds and funds we cannot open that come to under 1% of a bar are in Everything else.
What QNTM already gives you
- QNTM and TECH share 5 companies7.4%
- QNTM and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
- MVB and TECH share 0 companies0.0%
Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.
What each fund changed
Reading the holdings history…
Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.