Compare QNTM · TECH · MVB
QNTM, TECH and MVB hold 109 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and QNTM and TECH are the most alike: 7.4% of each is the same companies.
Return, last year
Price only, last year, each fund starting at 100. No fund here paid a distribution in this window.
Side by side
Holdings, fund by fund
- Information Technology
- Financials
- Industrials
- Consumer Discretionary
- Communication Services
- Everything else
- ANZANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 1 of 3QNTMnot heldTECHnot heldMVB20.7%
- NABNATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 1 of 3QNTMnot heldTECHnot heldMVB20.2%
- WBCWESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 1 of 3QNTMnot heldTECHnot heldMVB20.2%
- CBACOMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 1 of 3QNTMnot heldTECHnot heldMVB19.2%
- MQGMACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 1 of 3QNTMnot heldTECHnot heldMVB17.5%
- ANETARISTA NETWORKS INCIn 1 of 3QNTMnot heldTECH4.5%MVBnot held
- MSFTMICROSOFT CORPIn 2 of 3QNTM1.9%TECH4.3%MVBnot held
- APHAMPHENOL CORP CLASS AIn 1 of 3QNTMnot heldTECH4.2%MVBnot held
- NVDANVIDIA CORPIn 2 of 3QNTM1.9%TECH4.0%MVBnot held
- 6758SONY GROUP CORPIn 1 of 3QNTMnot heldTECH3.9%MVBnot held
What each fund is in
Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself. Cash, bonds and funds we cannot open that come to under 1% of a bar are in Everything else.
What QNTM already gives you
- QNTM and TECH share 5 companies7.4%
- QNTM and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
- TECH and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.
What each fund changed
Reading the holdings history…
Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.