ETFs with the most different mix from QNTM (VANECK QUANTUM ETF)
The ASX ETFs whose mix differs most from QNTM: by industry mix, BNKS (100% of the portfolio would have to move to match QNTM); by country mix, ATEC (100% of the portfolio would have to move to match QNTM). Figures as shown on 2026-10-11, from each fund's latest published holdings, rebuilt daily.
By industry
| Fund | Mix gap | Holdings classified | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BNKSBetaShares Global Banks Currency Hedged ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| CUREGlobal X S&P Biotech ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| DRUGBetaShares Global Healthcare Currency Hedged ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| HLTHVanEck Global Healthcare Leaders ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| IXJiShares Global Healthcare ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| MVBVanEck Australian Banks ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| OZRSTATE STREET SPDR S&P/ASX 200 RESOURCES ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| QREBetaShares Australian Resources Sector ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| RESMVANECK RARE EARTH AND STRATEGIC METALS X CHINA ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| SLVMGlobal X Silver Miners ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
By country
| Fund | Mix gap | Holdings classified | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATECBETASHARES S&P/ASX AUSTRALIAN TECHNOLOGY ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| MVBVanEck Australian Banks ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| MVRVanEck Australian Resources ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| OZFSTATE STREET SPDR S&P/ASX 200 FINANCIALS EX A-REIT ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| OZRSTATE STREET SPDR S&P/ASX 200 RESOURCES ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| QFNBetaShares Australian Financials Sector ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| QREBetaShares Australian Resources Sector ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| DRGNGlobal X China Tech ETF | 99% | 100% | Compare |
| ASIABetaShares Asia Technology Tigers ETF | 93% | 100% | Compare |
| URNMBetaShares Global Uranium ETF | 84% | 85% | Compare |
How to read this
Mix gap is the share of a portfolio that would have to move between industries or countries for the fund to match QNTM's mix: 0% is the same mix, 100% is nothing in common. It compares only the holdings that could be classified (100% of QNTM by industry, 100% by country; every fund listed has at least 80%), and only funds in the same asset class (sector). Geared, inverse and long-short funds are left out. A different mix is not a lower-risk or lower-correlation fund: it only means the money sits in other industries or countries, and it often surfaces narrow funds.
See also funds with a similar mix, or everything about QNTM.
General information only, not financial product advice. It does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Consider whether it is right for you and read the fund's product disclosure statement before deciding. See About for where the data comes from.