Compare RBTZ · ACDC · ESPO
RBTZ, ACDC and ESPO hold 146 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and RBTZ and ACDC are the most alike: 4.9% of each is the same companies.
Return, last year
Price only, last year, each fund starting at 100. Switch to total return to add distributions.
Side by side
Holdings, fund by fund
- Industrials
- Communication Services
- Information Technology
- Consumer Discretionary
- Materials
- Everything else
- ISRGINTUITIVE SURGICAL INCIn 1 of 3RBTZ8.9%ACDCnot heldESPOnot held
- 6954FANUC CORPIn 1 of 3RBTZ8.4%ACDCnot heldESPOnot held
- 6861KEYENCE CORPIn 1 of 3RBTZ8.3%ACDCnot heldESPOnot held
- ABBNABB LTD-REGIn 2 of 3RBTZ8.2%ACDC2.9%ESPOnot held
- NVDANVIDIA CORPIn 1 of 3RBTZ8.1%ACDCnot heldESPOnot held
- 700Tencent Holdings LtdIn 1 of 3RBTZnot heldACDCnot heldESPO8.1%
- NTESNetease IncIn 1 of 3RBTZnot heldACDCnot heldESPO7.5%
- 7974NINTENDO CO LTDIn 1 of 3RBTZnot heldACDCnot heldESPO7.4%
- TTWOTake-Two Interactive Software IncIn 1 of 3RBTZnot heldACDCnot heldESPO6.3%
- RBLXROBLOX CORP - AIn 1 of 3RBTZnot heldACDCnot heldESPO5.6%
What each fund is in
Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself. Cash, bonds and funds we cannot open that come to under 1% of a bar are in Everything else.
What RBTZ already gives you
- RBTZ and ACDC share 2 companies4.9%
- RBTZ and ESPO share 0 companies0.0%
- ACDC and ESPO share 0 companies0.0%
Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.
What each fund changed
Reading the holdings history…
Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.