ETFs with the most different mix from RBTZ (BetaShares Global Robotics and AI ETF)
The ASX ETFs whose mix differs most from RBTZ: by industry mix, BNKS (100% of the portfolio would have to move to match RBTZ); by country mix, ATEC (100% of the portfolio would have to move to match RBTZ). Figures as shown on 2026-10-10, from each fund's latest published holdings, rebuilt daily.
By industry
| Fund | Mix gap | Holdings classified | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BNKSBetaShares Global Banks Currency Hedged ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| MVBVanEck Australian Banks ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| OZRSTATE STREET SPDR S&P/ASX 200 RESOURCES ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| QREBetaShares Australian Resources Sector ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| SLVMGlobal X Silver Miners ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| URNMBetaShares Global Uranium ETF | 100% | 85% | Compare |
| WIREGlobal X Copper Miners ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| QFNBetaShares Australian Financials Sector ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| OZFSTATE STREET SPDR S&P/ASX 200 FINANCIALS EX A-REIT ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| MNRSBetaShares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
By country
| Fund | Mix gap | Holdings classified | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATECBETASHARES S&P/ASX AUSTRALIAN TECHNOLOGY ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| MVBVanEck Australian Banks ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| MVRVanEck Australian Resources ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| OZFSTATE STREET SPDR S&P/ASX 200 FINANCIALS EX A-REIT ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| OZRSTATE STREET SPDR S&P/ASX 200 RESOURCES ETF | 100% | 100% | Compare |
| QFNBetaShares Australian Financials Sector ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| QREBetaShares Australian Resources Sector ETF | 100% | 99% | Compare |
| URNMBetaShares Global Uranium ETF | 82% | 85% | Compare |
| DRGNGlobal X China Tech ETF | 81% | 100% | Compare |
| SLVMGlobal X Silver Miners ETF | 81% | 100% | Compare |
How to read this
Mix gap is the share of a portfolio that would have to move between industries or countries for the fund to match RBTZ's mix: 0% is the same mix, 100% is nothing in common. It compares only the holdings that could be classified (100% of RBTZ by industry, 100% by country; every fund listed has at least 80%), and only funds in the same asset class (sector). Geared, inverse and long-short funds are left out. A different mix is not a lower-risk or lower-correlation fund: it only means the money sits in other industries or countries, and it often surfaces narrow funds.
See also funds with a similar mix, or everything about RBTZ.
General information only, not financial product advice. It does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Consider whether it is right for you and read the fund's product disclosure statement before deciding. See About for where the data comes from.