WIRE vs CLDD vs QFN vs MVB
WIRE, CLDD, QFN and MVB hold 105 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and QFN and MVB are the most alike: 71% of each is the same companies.
Side by side
FundGlobal XBetaSharesBetaSharesVanEck
Asset classSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematicSector & thematic
Fee a year0.65%0.67%0.34%0.28%
Fund size$746.6m$33.0m$80.0m$279.0m
Holdings4043298
1Y price return+20.3%+15.8%−4.8%−4.6%
Distribution yield3.04%0.00%2.21%4.53%
Look-through coverage99.5%99.9%98.5%100.0%
Return, last year
change since the start
share of each fund
- WIRE
- CLDD
- QFN
- MVB
- CBA COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 2 of 4WIREnot heldCLDDnot heldQFN28.7%MVB19.2%
- ANZ ANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 2 of 4WIREnot heldCLDDnot heldQFN13.3%MVB20.7%
- NAB NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 2 of 4WIREnot heldCLDDnot heldQFN14.0%MVB20.2%
- WBC WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 2 of 4WIREnot heldCLDDnot heldQFN13.7%MVB20.2%
- MQG MACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 2 of 4WIREnot heldCLDDnot heldQFN10.2%MVB17.5%
and 95 more companies the funds hold