Lifestyle (LIC) is held by 5 ASX ETFs as of 15 Oct 2026. It weighs most in ISO, at 0.1% of the fund. Over the last year it fell 31.2%: on $10,000, −$3120. We explain 6 big moves in that time.
About LIC
- SectorReal Estate
- IndustryReal Estate Management & Development
- Size$468.7m
- Held by5 ETFs
- Big moves6 in 1Y
Each dot is a move we explain. Tap one, or a row of Why it moved, to see what caused it.
Why it moved
- −9.7%peak −12.1%12 Oct 2026· Operational
Lifestyle Communities fell sharply after its Q1 FY27 trading update revealed moderated (weaker) sales, disappointing the market and triggering a significant sell-off.
- +3.0%peak +13.9%21 Aug 2026· Regulatory
Lifestyle Communities shares surged after a Court of Appeal judgement was released, likely delivering a favourable legal outcome for the company
- −8.9%19 Jun 2026· Unknown
Lifestyle Communities shares fell 8.89% on a day when news cited an unexplained slide, likely driven by negative market sentiment or company-specific factors not fully detailed.
- +9.8%18 Jun 2026· Operational
Strong operational update with 209 new home sales likely drove the stock up on June 18, 2026.
- +17.2%13 Mar 2026· Stake Change
A block trade facilitated by JPMorgan triggered the stock's sharp rise.
- −7.1%19 Feb 2026· Earnings Miss
The stock dropped ahead of its half-year results release, likely due to investor concerns about an impending earnings miss.
Held by 5 ETFs
Of every $10,000 in each fund, how much is in LIC today.
Other Real Estate companies
- COFCenturia37 ETFs
- SGPStockland31 ETFs
- GMGGoodman29 ETFs
- SCGScentre29 ETFs
- GPTGPT Group28 ETFs
- VCXVicinity28 ETFs
- BWPBWP Group27 ETFs
- CHCCharter Hall27 ETFs
Why did LIC fall 37.2% on 9 Jul 2025?
Lifestyle
Lifestyle Communities' exit fee model suffered a legal loss, raising immediate concerns about debt covenant breaches and triggering a sharp sell-off.
The multi-bagger price move (-37.22%, 20.5x ATR) on 2025-07-09 correlates directly with two AFR articles published the same day detailing a court loss on exit fees that 'puts retirement estates on notice' and undoes the company's business model story. A follow-up article on 2025-07-10 explicitly links this loss to a risk of debt covenant breach, which is a significant regulatory/financial event that fully explains the extreme negative move.
Written by a language model from the evidence below, and it can be wrong. Tell us and we will fix or remove it. General information only, not financial product advice. It does not consider your objectives, finances or needs. Past performance is not a guide to future performance.
Evidence
News coverage
What it did to the 5 ETFs holding LIC
On $10,000 in each fund, at the weight it holds today