Compare HACK · CURE · MVB
HACK, CURE and MVB hold 209 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and HACK and CURE are the most alike: 0.0% of each is the same companies.
Return, last year
Price only, last year, each fund starting at 100. Switch to total return to add distributions.
Side by side
Holdings, fund by fund
- Health Care
- Financials
- Information Technology
- Industrials
- Communication Services
- ANZANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 1 of 3HACKnot heldCUREnot heldMVB20.7%
- NABNATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 1 of 3HACKnot heldCUREnot heldMVB20.2%
- WBCWESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 1 of 3HACKnot heldCUREnot heldMVB20.2%
- CBACOMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 1 of 3HACKnot heldCUREnot heldMVB19.2%
- MQGMACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 1 of 3HACKnot heldCUREnot heldMVB17.5%
- CRWDCROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INCIn 1 of 3HACK8.9%CUREnot heldMVBnot held
- FTNTFORTINET INCIn 1 of 3HACK8.1%CUREnot heldMVBnot held
- PANWPALO ALTO NETWORKS INCIn 1 of 3HACK8.0%CUREnot heldMVBnot held
- CSCOCISCO SYSTEMS INCIn 1 of 3HACK7.6%CUREnot heldMVBnot held
- AVGOBROADCOM INCIn 1 of 3HACK7.5%CUREnot heldMVBnot held
What each fund is in
Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself.
What HACK already gives you
- HACK and CURE share 0 companies0.0%
- HACK and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
- CURE and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.
What each fund changed
Reading the holdings history…
Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.