Compare HACK · PAVE · MVB
HACK, PAVE and MVB hold 152 companies between them. None is in every one of them, and HACK and MVB are the most alike: 0.0% of each is the same companies.
Return, last year
Price only, last year, each fund starting at 100. Switch to total return to add distributions.
Side by side
Holdings, fund by fund
- Financials
- Information Technology
- Industrials
- Materials
- Utilities
- Everything else
- ANZANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDIn 1 of 3HACKnot heldPAVEnot heldMVB20.7%
- NABNATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITEDIn 1 of 3HACKnot heldPAVEnot heldMVB20.2%
- WBCWESTPAC BANKING CORPORATIONIn 1 of 3HACKnot heldPAVEnot heldMVB20.2%
- CBACOMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA.In 1 of 3HACKnot heldPAVEnot heldMVB19.2%
- MQGMACQUARIE GROUP LIMITEDIn 1 of 3HACKnot heldPAVEnot heldMVB17.5%
- CRWDCROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INCIn 1 of 3HACK8.9%PAVEnot heldMVBnot held
- FTNTFORTINET INCIn 1 of 3HACK8.1%PAVEnot heldMVBnot held
- PANWPALO ALTO NETWORKS INCIn 1 of 3HACK8.0%PAVEnot heldMVBnot held
- CSCOCISCO SYSTEMS INCIn 1 of 3HACK7.6%PAVEnot heldMVBnot held
- AVGOBROADCOM INCIn 1 of 3HACK7.5%PAVEnot heldMVBnot held
What each fund is in
Each figure is the company's weight inside that fund, so the funds are read against each other and nothing is added up. A company listed on two exchanges counts once in a fund. Each bar in the mix is one fund as 100% of itself.
What HACK already gives you
- HACK and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
- HACK and PAVE share 0 companies0.0%
- PAVE and MVB share 0 companies0.0%
Overlap is the smaller weight in every company both funds hold: the share of each fund the other already covers. Grouped by company, so a listing on two exchanges is one holding.
What each fund changed
Reading the holdings history…
Holdings are published monthly, so this is the last publication, not this week. A re-weight counts once it moves 0.25 points of the fund or more — below that, weights are just prices moving.