Australian (ACL) is held by 7 ASX ETFs. Over the last 3 months it rose 32.4%: on $10,000, +$3243. We explain 3 big moves in that time.
About ACL
- SectorHealth Care
- IndustryHealth Care Equipment & Services
- Size$522.3m
- Held by7 ETFs
- Big moves3 in 3M
Each dot is a move we explain. Tap one, or a row of Why it moved, to see what caused it.
Why it moved
- +5.0%peak +7.1%9 Oct 2026· Stake Change
Citigroup filed a substantial shareholder notice disclosing a 5.12% voting stake in Australian Clinical Labs, signalling new institutional buying interest.
- +14.9%peak +21.7%17 Aug 2026· Earnings Beat
Australian Clinical Labs shares surged after analyst/media coverage highlighting improving margins and an earnings growth outlook despite softer revenue, attracting renewed buyer interest.
- +6.2%16 Jul 2026· Unknown
ACL.AX rose sharply with no clear trigger, as the modest 0.5% gain in the broader healthcare sector index is far too small to explain a 5.5% move, leaving the cause unknown.
Held by 7 ETFs
Of every $10,000 in each fund, how much is in ACL today.
- MVSVanEck Small Companies Masters ETF$1711.71%
- SSOSTATE STREET SPDR S&P/ASX SMALL ORDINARIES ETF$180.18%
- ISOiShares S&P/ASX Small Ordinaries ETF$180.18%
- QOZBetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF$7.130.07%
- VETHVanguard Ethically Conscious Australian Shares ETF$2.520.03%
- A300Global X Australia 300 ETF$2.040.02%
- VASVanguard Australian Shares Index ETF$1.780.02%
Why did ACL rise 6.2% on 16 Jul 2026?
Australian
ACL.AX rose sharply with no clear trigger, as the modest 0.5% gain in the broader healthcare sector index is far too small to explain a 5.5% move, leaving the cause unknown.
There are no company announcements, no relevant news articles, and no peer or commodity signals that could account for a 3.9x ATR move of this magnitude. The healthcare sector (^AXHJ) moved only 0.5%, which is well below the abnormal threshold and directionally aligned but insufficiently strong to be the driver. Volume at 1.53x normal is elevated but not extreme, suggesting some informed buying or a small liquidity-driven move rather than a broad sector rotation, but without a clear catalyst the cause cannot be determined from available evidence.
Written by a language model from the evidence below, and it can be wrong. Tell us and we will fix or remove it. General information only, not financial product advice. It does not consider your objectives, finances or needs. Past performance is not a guide to future performance.
Evidence
Sector / macro signals
What it did to the 7 ETFs holding ACL
On $10,000 in each fund, at the weight it holds today