No ASX ETF holds Devex Res. (DEV) as of 15 Oct 2026. Over the last year it fell 10.3%: on $10,000, −$1034. We explain 5 big moves in that time.
About DEV
- SectorEnergy
- IndustryEnergy
- Size$106.5m
- Held by0 ETFs
- Big moves5 in 1Y
Each dot is a move we explain. Tap one, or a row of Why it moved, to see what caused it.
Why it moved
- −18.8%22 Jun 2026· Sector Flow
DevEx Resources' stock dropped sharply as investors sold the exploration stock, likely amid sector-wide pressure on uranium and copper explorers.
- +25.5%18 Jun 2026· Analyst
Bell Potter initiated coverage with a buy rating on the company, highlighting its strategic uranium pipeline.
- +10.9%17 Jun 2026· Analyst
Investor interest driven by uranium-focused broker coverage and sector momentum
- −17.6%21 Nov 2025· Unknown
No matching explanatory news article was found for the price drop; the only cited article is a positive operational update published three days later.
- +47.8%19 Nov 2025· Unknown
No direct news found; abnormal price movement likely due to a corporate announcement or speculative trading not covered by available sources.
Held by 0 ETFs
No ETF we track holds DEV directly.
Other Energy companies
- STXStrike Energy37 ETFs
- AXPAXP Energy36 ETFs
- TERTerracom36 ETFs
- KEYKEY Petroleum35 ETFs
- WDSWoodside34 ETFs
- SANSagalio Energy33 ETFs
- ALDAmpol32 ETFs
- NHCNew Hope32 ETFs
Why did DEV rise 47.8% on 19 Nov 2025?
Devex Res.
No direct news found; abnormal price movement likely due to a corporate announcement or speculative trading not covered by available sources.
The price move is large (11x ATR) and volume elevated, typical of significant news, but no relevant articles were found. Without any coverage, the cause cannot be determined, and the 'unknown' category is appropriate. The low confidence reflects the lack of evidence.
Written by a language model from the evidence below, and it can be wrong. Tell us and we will fix or remove it. General information only, not financial product advice. It does not consider your objectives, finances or needs. Past performance is not a guide to future performance.
No evidence layer produced anything for this event.