Regal Partners (RPL) is held by 6 ASX ETFs. Over the last 3 months it fell 30.4%: on $10,000, −$3045. We explain 2 big moves in that time.
About RPL
- SectorFinancials
- IndustryFinancial Services
- Size$894.8m
- Held by6 ETFs
- Big moves2 in 3M
Each dot is a move we explain. Tap one, or a row of Why it moved, to see what caused it.
Why it moved
- −4.7%peak −6.2%28 Aug 2026· Management
Regal Partners shares fell as markets continued to digest the surprise retirement of founder and star fund manager Phil King, announced on 24 August, raising concerns about key-person risk and future performance.
- −2.8%peak −10.0%24 Aug 2026· Sector Flow
RPL.AX fell as part of a broad sell-off across the ASX Financials sector, with no company-specific news to explain the move.
Held by 6 ETFs
Of every $10,000 in each fund, how much is in RPL today.
- ISOiShares S&P/ASX Small Ordinaries ETF$230.23%
- SSOSTATE STREET SPDR S&P/ASX SMALL ORDINARIES ETF$220.22%
- IHDiShares S&P/ASX Dividend Opportunities ESG Screened ETF$110.11%
- VETHVanguard Ethically Conscious Australian Shares ETF$2.510.03%
- VASVanguard Australian Shares Index ETF$2.320.02%
- A300Global X Australia 300 ETF$2.120.02%
Why did RPL fall 4.7% on 28 Aug 2026?
Regal Partners
Regal Partners shares fell as markets continued to digest the surprise retirement of founder and star fund manager Phil King, announced on 24 August, raising concerns about key-person risk and future performance.
The Phil King retirement announcement on 24 August is the dominant negative catalyst in the evidence — described as 'end of an era' and generating 'banker nightmares' commentary from the AFR, signalling material key-person risk concern. The 1H26 results released simultaneously were described as record growth, so the results themselves were positive, ruling out earnings_miss as the driver; the negative price reaction is instead attributable to succession uncertainty. The sector index (^AXFJ) was up 0.2% on the same day with no sector-wide pressure, confirming this is stock-specific, and the move at 2.8x ATR on modest 1.5x volume suggests a delayed or ongoing re-rating rather than a fresh shock, consistent with the market still processing a multi-day-old management departure story.
Written by a language model from the evidence below, and it can be wrong. Tell us and we will fix or remove it. General information only, not financial product advice. It does not consider your objectives, finances or needs. Past performance is not a guide to future performance.
Evidence
News coverage
Sector / macro signals
What it did to the 6 ETFs holding RPL
On $10,000 in each fund, at the weight it holds today