Silver Mines (SVL) is held by 1 ASX ETF. Over the last 6 months it fell 18.2%: on $10,000, −$1818. We explain 8 big moves in that time.
About SVL
- SectorMaterials
- IndustryMaterials
- Size$344.6m
- Held by1 ETF
- Big moves8 in 6M
Each dot is a move we explain. Tap one, or a row of Why it moved, to see what caused it.
Why it moved
- −11.4%23 Sep 2026· Capital Raise
Silver Mines fell sharply after announcing a $70 million equity placement, as existing shareholders were diluted by the new share issuance at a discount to market price.
- +6.3%18 Sep 2026· Regulatory
Silver Mines shares rose as investors anticipated a potentially favourable upcoming regulatory planning decision on the company's key project.
- +6.7%11 Aug 2026· Operational
Silver Mines rose after a news article highlighted the company deepening its land strategy at the Bowdens silver project, drawing investor interest.
- −13.8%18 Jun 2026· Capital Raise
Silver Mines raised $7.46 million in a funding boost, likely via a capital raise causing dilution.
- +11.1%15 Jun 2026· Capital Raise
Silver Mines Limited received a $7.46 million funding boost, likely through a capital raise.
- −9.4%4 Jun 2026· Capital Raise
Silver Mines shares dropped after announcing an option underwriting deal, indicating a potential capital raise or dilution concern.
- −6.5%28 May 2026· Operational
The 6.45% drop on May 28 likely reflects profit-taking after the stock surged on May 26 due to a strategic land acquisition for the Bowdens Silver Project.
- +8.8%9 Apr 2026· Commodity
No news articles were found to explain the price move; likely driven by broader silver price movement or sector flow.
Held by 1 ETF
Of every $10,000 in each fund, how much is in SVL today.
Why did SVL fall 6.5% on 28 May 2026?
Silver Mines
The 6.45% drop on May 28 likely reflects profit-taking after the stock surged on May 26 due to a strategic land acquisition for the Bowdens Silver Project.
The only company-specific news near the date was a positive announcement about a land acquisition, which caused a surge on May 26. The price drop on May 28 is not directly tied to any news item; it could be a pullback or sector/macro-related, since the May 26 article mentions geopolitical concerns with Iran. Given the lack of negative news directly explaining the fall, the cause is inferred as profit-taking following the prior move.
General information only, not personal advice — prepared without regard to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Past performance is not indicative of future performance.
Evidence
News coverage
What it did to the 1 ETF holding SVL
On $10,000 in each fund, at the weight it holds today